How JustLayMe frames consent, participant mapping, shared conversations, privacy responsibilities, and safe use for Grey Mirror analysis before upload.
A conversation contains someone else's words as well as yours. Before uploading, consider consent, your right to share the material and who will see the report. Having access to a conversation does not settle those questions.
Authored policy source: May 14, 2026
Mapping
Participant resolution asks you to identify your side and the other participant.
No surveillance
The product is not for covert monitoring, stalking, or coercion.
Minimal MCP
The connector returns no raw participant messages by default.
Participant mapping
Grey Mirror may pause when it cannot safely infer which participant is you and which participant is the other person. The participant mapping step exists to avoid misattribution.
Only participant IDs from the current job candidates should be accepted. Arbitrary participant IDs should not resume a job.
Consent and lawful basis
You are responsible for having a lawful basis or appropriate permission to upload relationship communication, especially when it includes another person.
Do not upload material you are not allowed to possess, process, or share. Do not use the product to harass, stalk, threaten, expose, or manipulate someone.
Shared privacy
Relationship data is often jointly sensitive. A report may describe patterns involving another person, but that does not make the report a public document.
Use summaries carefully and avoid sharing private details outside the context where you have consent or another lawful basis.
MCP participant safety
The ChatGPT connector can check status and submit participant mapping for owned jobs, but it must not expose raw intimate message content by default.
If participant resolution is needed, deep links back to JustLayMe remain available for the full account-controlled flow.
What participant mapping does and does not prove
Participant mapping only tells the system which sender label belongs to you and which label belongs to the other participant. It improves attribution for timing, repair, initiation, and reciprocity metrics; it does not verify consent, identity, legal ownership, or whether the upload should be shared outside your account.
If a group chat, forwarded export, shared device, or nickname collision makes the labels unclear, the safer path is to pause, confirm the mapping, and treat any report confidence as limited until the participants are resolved correctly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I analyze someone else without permission?
You are responsible for having a lawful basis or appropriate consent. The product is not for covert surveillance, harassment, or coercion.
Why does participant mapping matter?
Misattribution can invert the meaning of a report. Participant confirmation helps the system avoid assigning patterns to the wrong side.
Permission comes before participant interpretation
Visual guide updated
01
Choose an appropriate conversation
Use a conversation you can access lawfully and have permission to analyze.
02
Confirm the sender labels
Check the export’s actual names and confirm who YOU and THEM represent before analysis proceeds.
03
Respect the evidence boundary
A shared thread does not give access to private motives or consent for unrelated uses.
Conceptual reading guide. This diagram explains what to inspect; it is not a customer report, diagnostic test or measured relationship score.Use this guide on the question you came with
If the sender identity is unclear, pause and resolve it. Guessing who wrote each message can reverse every comparison in the report.