Open the report
Explore the timeline, findings and presentation.
Grey Mirror vs ScanMyLove: compare psychology, full-history metrics, report evidence and one-time pricing, using official sources checked October 2, 2026.
By Layne Weant
Published
Updated
Choose Grey Mirror when you want to trace patterns through a whole conversation and inspect the measurements behind a finding. ScanMyLove organizes reports around psychological frameworks. Grey Mirror publishes its analyzer inventory, metric definitions, research and evidence standards. Both offer export-based analysis and one-time paid reports.
Explore the timeline, findings and presentation.
Read the complete analyzer inventory and metric definitions.
See the findings, source data and study limits.
Grey Mirror measures communication patterns using published methods, supporting messages and stated limitations. It does not provide a clinical assessment. Naming a psychological framework can explain how a report approaches a conversation. You still need to see what was measured in yours. Who tried to reconnect? How did the other person respond? Did the same pattern return months later?
Grey Mirror combines those measurements with chronology and supporting messages. Its relationship memory connects recurring episodes across the history. The reason to pay for depth is to follow a finding all the way back to the conversation.
The Signal Is Rare publishes the questions behind the product. In its 29-history cohort, affection signals outnumbered explicit repair attempts by about 10.7 to 1; a separate 44-history cohort contained only five histories with more repair than escalation. Those are different measures from different cohorts, with the data and exclusions published. A warm exchange does not establish that an argument was resolved, which is why the report measures affection and repair separately.
ScanMyLove’s listed reports cost less than Grey Mirror’s $17.99 complete report. Our case is the depth you can examine: a full relationship timeline, participant metrics, response history, conflict and repair, recurring patterns, turning points, Memory Lane, custom charts, evidence, and available analyzer results. Open our public example, read the inventory, and preview your real story before deciding.
If you want an inexpensive read of a conversation through named psychological frameworks, ScanMyLove is built for that: its Essential report is listed at $3.69 and Premium at $4.99, both one-time, with a timeline, action plan and PDF in Premium.
If you want to follow a pattern through the whole history, Grey Mirror is built for that. It shows when effort became uneven, how reply timing and affection moved month by month, whether conflict was followed by repair, and the messages behind each finding. The complete report is $17.99 once. Open the public example and preview your own story first, so the price is judged against depth you have actually seen.
Published by Grey Mirror, using ScanMyLove’s own documentation as checked on October 2, 2026 (sources below). It compares documented features, not tested accuracy, and ScanMyLove’s prices can change.
They count different things. Grey Mirror has 30 analyzers built on up to 47 models. ScanMyLove’s 14 are psychological frameworks, not models. Neither number establishes an independent accuracy ranking.
No. Grey Mirror analyzes communication patterns using published methods and supporting messages. Its reports do not diagnose people or establish their intent.
Grey Mirror has 30 analyzers built on up to 47 models. The complete report reads the full history and links findings to the messages behind them, including the full timeline, Memory Lane and custom charts. ScanMyLove lists lower one-time prices for framework-based reports. Preview your own story before deciding.
Yes. ScanMyLove lists one-time Essential and Premium reports, and Grey Mirror charges $17.99 once per complete report. Grey Mirror also offers an optional $9.99/month plan for one full report each paid month.
Compare the dimensions
Visual guide updated
Check current official documentation for the supported export and context the product uses.
Inspect how each product presents findings and what evidence can be revisited.
Read current terms and access limits before sharing a private conversation.
Use the dated source links on the comparison page. Public marketing claims are not a controlled head-to-head benchmark.