JustLayMe

Free Chat Redaction Tool: Remove Personal Info

Remove names, phone numbers, emails, and addresses from a chat transcript locally before sharing it with AI or anyone else. No upload, account, or server.

How do you redact a conversation before sharing it?

Mirror Veil strips names, phone numbers, email addresses and other identifying details out of a chat or message export before you hand it to a lawyer, a therapist, or an AI. It is a single HTML file you download and open, so there is no upload, no account and no server; disconnect from the internet and it still works, which is a faster way to verify that than reading a privacy policy. It is free and MIT licensed.

  • One person stays one person: it builds an alias graph, so "Mike", "Mikey" and his phone number all become the same stable token instead of three unrelated blanks.
  • That matters because pattern-based redactors destroy the thread — whoever reads the result can no longer follow who said what, which defeats the point of sharing it.
  • Nothing is uploaded. The file runs entirely in your browser, and it keeps working with the network disconnected.
  • Handles exports from iMessage, WhatsApp, Instagram DMs and Android SMS, plus plain CSV, JSON, TXT and HTML transcripts.
  • Open source under MIT at github.com/justlayme/mirror-veil, so the redaction logic can be reviewed rather than trusted.
  • Useful before sending a conversation to a therapist or solicitor, before pasting one into ChatGPT or Claude, and before uploading anything to Grey Mirror itself.

Is it safe to paste a conversation into ChatGPT or Claude?

Assume anything you paste may be retained. That is the specific moment Mirror Veil is built for: redact the thread first, then paste the redacted version. The substance of the conversation survives, the identities do not.

Because one person keeps one token, the assistant can still follow who said what. That is the difference between a redacted conversation that is still useful and a wall of blanks that is not.

How do you share texts with a lawyer or therapist without exposing names?

Export the thread, open Mirror Veil, and share the redacted output instead of the original. Names, nicknames, handles, phone numbers, email addresses, street addresses and card numbers that pass a Luhn check are replaced with stable tokens.

Timestamps, speaker order, message lengths and the wording that carries tone are deliberately preserved. Removing those would make the conversation useless to the person you are sharing it with, which defeats the purpose of sending it at all.

How is redaction different from anonymisation?

Redaction removes identifiers. Anonymisation would mean nobody can be re-identified, and Mirror Veil does not claim that. Preserved context can still point at a person: a named employer, an unusual event, a distinctive turn of phrase.

The tool says so in its own output and in its threat model. Read the redacted file before you share it, and look specifically for surviving context rather than surviving names.

How can you verify nothing is uploaded?

Disconnect from the internet and use it. It works unchanged, which is a faster and more convincing test than reading a privacy policy.

The shipped file is fully self-contained: no external scripts, styles, fonts or images, and no fetch, XMLHttpRequest, WebSocket or navigator.sendBeacon call anywhere in it. There is no code path that could transmit anything, and no CDN, analytics vendor or font host that could observe use as a side effect.

What the SHA-256 receipt proves

Every run can emit a plain-text receipt recording the tool version, the processing timestamp, SHA-256 of the input and of the output, per-category counts of what was removed, and how many people were resolved.

The two hashes let you prove later which exact input produced which exact output. The receipt records what was removed; it is not a guarantee that nothing identifying remains.

Known limitations, stated plainly

  • Redaction is not anonymisation: preserved content can still identify someone.
  • Detection is heuristic. Unusual spellings, transliterations, in-jokes used as names, and international number or address formats outside the patterns can be missed.
  • Only participants get stable tokens. Third parties mentioned in passing are treated conservatively and may be left in place.
  • Images, attachments and voice notes are out of scope; they are not inspected or redacted.
  • It does nothing about the other participant copy of the conversation, or the platform copy.
  • It does not encrypt anything and is not a secure transport. How you send the redacted file is a separate problem.

Source, licence and threat model

Mirror Veil is open source under the MIT licence, so the redaction logic can be reviewed rather than trusted. The full threat model, including what the tool explicitly does not solve, is published in the repository.

Mirror Veil is a free tool that removes the identities from a conversation before it is shared with a lawyer, a therapist, or an AI assistant. It is a single HTML file that runs entirely on the user device: there is no upload, no account, and no server, so the conversation never leaves the machine it is opened on.

It removes names, nicknames, handles, phone numbers, email addresses, street addresses, and card numbers, while deliberately preserving timestamps, turn taking, message length, and the wording that carries tone. Every alias of one person resolves to a single consistent token, and each run can emit a SHA-256 receipt recording exactly what was removed. Mirror Veil does not claim anonymity: context can still identify people, so the cleaned file should be reviewed before sharing.

Download Mirror Veil

Mirror Veil is a single HTML file. Save it and open it locally, or open it directly -- either way the conversation never leaves your machine.

Start here

More from Grey Mirror

Read the layers

Presentation should reveal the evidence, not cover it

Visual guide updated

  1. Your supplied history

    The underlying conversation and its available dates define the material a report can explain.

  2. A readable reveal

    Visual pacing can make patterns easier to follow without adding invented messages or events.

  3. Evidence you can revisit

    Return to the supporting exchanges rather than treating an animation as proof of a conclusion.

Conceptual reading guide. This diagram explains what to inspect; it is not a customer report, diagnostic test or measured relationship score.
Use this guide on the question you came with

Use the visual presentation as a reading aid. The messages, measured windows and explicit limitations remain the basis for interpretation.