Reciprocity score
How the effort split is calculated, and what the number does and does not claim.
Your entire text history. Both sides of it. Grey Mirror tells the relationship story across time: who reaches out, how replies change, what happens after conflict, and which dated messages support the pattern.
By Layne Weant
Updated
A couples text message analyzer compares communication patterns across a conversation between partners. Grey Mirror measures initiation, reply timing, affection, conflict and detected repair attempts. It compares participants where the data supports a split and keeps thread-level findings separate. Dated messages let you check a finding against what was actually said.
What gets measured
You may remember the same conversation differently. Counts and dates give you somewhere concrete to start. Each comparison needs enough messages and reliable participant labels; a missing value is not a zero.
Reading it together
Start with one question you both want to understand. Read the messages around a finding, include what happened off the phone, and leave room for each person to disagree with the interpretation.
Bring the recurring split to the conversation rather than a single message either of you regrets.
Every finding links to the messages behind it, so a disputed claim can be inspected rather than argued.
The report describes behaviour, not intent, and never says whether to stay or leave.
Before couples therapy
Use your Grey Mirror report to find the pattern you keep trying to explain: the same disagreement returning, an apology that changes the tone, or a shift neither of you can quite date. Bring those examples and the missing offline context to your therapist.
Start with your conversation
Psychology-informed relationship analysis, with metrics and supporting messages you can examine. Grey Mirror is developed by Wentropy Labs and available through JustLayMe, the consumer web platform Wentropy Labs operates.
Grey Mirror publishes its analyzer inventory, measurement methods and aggregate research. The studies describe self-selected conversation histories, not all couples. You can inspect the data, limitations and withheld measures before uploading.
An export contains the other person’s messages as well as yours, and that is worth being straight about. The tool cannot tell whether both of you consented, so the decision sits with you, and the consent and participants page sets out what we ask people to consider. If you want to strip names, numbers and identifying details before uploading anything, Mirror Veil does that locally in your browser with no upload at all.
Include the period you want to understand and enough earlier history to compare it with. A stressful week can look different from an ordinary month. A longer export helps you inspect that difference, but missing messages, calls and in-person conversations still limit the conclusion. Preserve sender names, timestamps and message order.
Grey Mirror previews your real relationship story from your own uploaded conversation. The complete timeline, Memory Lane, custom charts, metrics, evidence, and available analyzer results cost $17.99 USD once, with monthly plan optional. The initial analysis is completely free, with no card required.
Yes. Grey Mirror can analyze a supported export for initiation, response timing, affection, conflict and detected repair attempts. Participant comparisons use the same rule on both sides where the metric supports a split. It cannot determine private intentions or account for conversations missing from the export.
Grey Mirror supports WhatsApp, iMessage, SMS, Instagram DM and Telegram exports. Export steps differ by app. Keep sender names, timestamps and message order so the report can compare both participants over time.
You can review the report together in the uploading account. Supported participant comparisons and dated evidence help you discuss the same record. Uploading does not automatically give the other participant account access.
It can give you concrete examples to discuss: recurring exchanges, changes in communication and what follows a repair attempt. You can export your unlocked Grey Mirror report as a PDF. Ask your therapist whether they want to see it, include context outside the messages and leave room for both partners to disagree with an interpretation.
No. Grey Mirror measures patterns in a supplied message history. It does not diagnose either partner, decide who is right or replace couples therapy. Offline context can change how you understand a finding.
No. One complete export can include both sides. Confirm the participant mapping before analysis, and review consent and privacy together before uploading a shared conversation.
Grey Mirror is designed for complete supported conversation exports. Keep the history relevant to your question, including an earlier period for comparison. Missing messages and off-thread exchanges limit what the report can establish, regardless of file length.
Compare the dimensions
Visual guide updated
Compare initiation, responses and repair using confirmed sender labels.
Read how one person’s message is answered rather than judging either person in isolation.
Bring offline events and agreed expectations into the interpretation of the supplied thread.
Use the report to discuss a concrete pattern together. A both-person comparison is not a competition to identify the worse partner.
Agree on the purpose before uploading a shared private history. One person may want to understand repair after arguments while the other wants clearer expectations about availability. Naming the question prevents a report from becoming a contest over whose score looks better. Read the consent and privacy guidance, and choose a history appropriate to that purpose.
Confirm YOU and THEM from the actual sender evidence. A mapping error can reverse initiation, timing and participant comparisons even when the parser successfully reads every message. Check the reported date range too: a partial export may describe the recent period accurately without representing the whole relationship.
Choose one dated finding to discuss together. Each person can say what fits, what seems incomplete and what offline context the export omits. Then agree on one observable next step, such as how to return after a pause or make a plan concrete. Revisit the next relevant exchanges rather than asking the report to settle an argument permanently.